Suppose I collected data of crop yield at a location for mutliple years and constrcut a model of the form
lm(yield ~ drought_index + solar_radiation + heat_stress)
where my drought_index
is defined on a scale of 0 to 1 where 0 means total absence of water for the crop and 1 means complete water. heat_stress
goes from 0 to 1 with 0 meaning no heat stress and 1 means complete complete heat_stress (opposite of drought_index), solar_radiation
also goes from 20 to 30. I did not observe zero solar radiaiton for obvious reasons.
From theory, if solar radiation
and drought_index
were zero and heat_stress
was 1, you would expect zero yield.
So I wonder if this is the case where I can fit a model without the intercept i.e.
lm(yield ~ drought_index + solar_radiation + heat_stress + 0)
Does this seem correct?
The answers marked is just a general guidance on when and when not to fit the intercept. What I am looking for is to how do I use it in my special case.