I am trying to best analyse a set of foraging ecology data with >10 behaviour categories (DVs) and 3 levels of IV (season, sex, age). The time which an animal spent engaged in a behaviour was recorded and then divided by the total time spent in sight of the observer, so my data are proportional. As is typical, not all animals engaged in all behaviours and there are a large number of zeros in my dataset which is severely over-dispersed. I had initially analysed all the data in R using the glm
function with family = quasibinomial
, followed by anova. The intention was then to use the false discovery rate alpha to account for the large number of analyses. However, it has since been suggested that a multivariate approach might be better so I have been trying to figure out (a) if it's possible to run a quasi-binomial multivariate analysis of proportion data (b) how to go about it.
In the R documentation quasi-binomial family function page (from the VGAM package, the function mentioned above is quasibinomial()
from base R) it is stated that if multivariate response = TRUE the response matrix should be binary. This seems a pretty straightforward indictment of my idea to run this analysis on my proportion data, but I am wondering why - is this just not possible and why not; or is there a particular package that could help?