-2

One solution that I heard is aru can be used for people you're not close to and iru for people you are close to, so like a humble thing, but, I don't know if it's actually said, and aru is for unliving things, but is this really into depth, and I just didn't get into depth? By the way, this isn't a clone, because all the things I have searched up are dumbed down into one meaning but no explanation really... To stay, to keep, but why aru isn't?

Star Peep
  • 83
  • 5

1 Answers1

4

As I said in the comment section, you must see the particle before ある/いる. "ある is for inanimate things and いる is for animate things" is a rule that is relevant when ある/いる is used as an existence verb. This rule has nothing to do with the usage of ある and いる because these constructions do not express the existence of something/someone in the first place.

Basically ~である is a stilted copula, i.e., a literary version of ~だ. ~でいる is a copula in progressive aspect, i.e., "to stay/keep X" in English. See: What is the difference between でいる and である in this example? / What is the meaning/grammar behind noun + でいる?

Here is a very simple summary:

  • Xいる。
    There is X.
    (X is a person, animal, etc.)
  • Xある。
    There is X.
    (X is an inanimate object.)
  • AXある。
    A is X. (literary/formal)
    (X is a noun, a na-adjective or a no-adjective)
  • AXいる。
    A stays X. / A keeps being X.
    (X is a noun, a na-adjective or a no-adjective)

And simplest examples:

  • いる。
    There is a cat.
    (猫 is an animal)
  • ある。
    There is a book.
    (本 is an inanimate object)
  • 学生ある。
    I am a student.
    (である is a stilted だ)
  • 元気いる。
    I am keeping healthy. / I'm doing well.
naruto
  • 285,549
  • 12
  • 305
  • 582