When you click to read a Yahoo news article, the URL is suffixed with .html
Why Yahoo does not opt for pretty URLs instead?
Is .html URL suffixing better for SEO?
When you click to read a Yahoo news article, the URL is suffixed with .html
Why Yahoo does not opt for pretty URLs instead?
Is .html URL suffixing better for SEO?
No. It makes no difference. On the contrary, one could argue that shorter and cleaner urls are better than adding the file extension like in this case.
.html and seo-url/ both looks same for search engines as I know,if them both readable by human.
Example :
my-seo-url.html
my-seo-url/
my-seo-url
Here is a nice article to read.
https://moz.com/blog/15-seo-best-practices-for-structuring-urls