17

In one paper describing results of survival analysis I have read a statement that implies that one can translate Hazard ratio (HR) into ratio of median survival times ($M_1$ and $M_2$) using the formula:

$HR = \frac{M_1}{M_2}$

I'm sure it doesn't hold when one cannot assume proportional hazard model (as nothing works if HR is not well-defined). But I suspect, that even then it wouldn't work for any survival distribution except exponential. Is my intuition right?

Peter Flom
  • 94,055
  • 35
  • 143
  • 276
Adam Ryczkowski
  • 2,092
  • 2
  • 18
  • 33
  • Like the first person I am interested in calculating a hazard ratio (HR) from a ratio of survival times (assuming the distributional assumptions hold). I just wanted to add a point of clarification Suppose I want to calculate the HR for treatment 1 versus 2 Median survival on treatment 1 is 1 years (M1=1) Median survival on treatment 2 is 2 year (M2=2) then surely my HR for treatment 1 versus 2 is M2/M1 = 2 and not M1/M2 = 1/2 so we have to reverse the signs, am I right? Jack –  Nov 27 '14 at 11:53

1 Answers1

16

Your intuition is correct. The following relationship between survival functions holds: $$ S_1(t)=S_0(t)^r $$ where $r$ is the hazard ratio (see, e.g. the Wikipedia article Hazard ratio). From this we may show that your statement implies an exponential survival function.

Let us denote the medians by $M_r$, $M_1$ for two variables with hazard ratio $r$. Your statement implies $$ M_r = M_0/r $$ From the definition of the median, we get $$ S_r(M_0/r)=0.5 $$ Then, we substitute the relationship between survival functions $$ S_0(M_0/r)^r=0.5 \Rightarrow S_0(M_0/r) = 0.5^{1/r} $$ This holds for any $r$, hence $$ S_0(t) = 0.5^{t/M_0} = e^{t\frac{\log 0.5}{M_0}} $$ Hence, if the statement in your question holds for arbitrary HR, the survival distribution must be exponential.

Scortchi - Reinstate Monica
  • 27,560
  • 8
  • 81
  • 248
Juho Kokkala
  • 7,463
  • 4
  • 27
  • 46