1

I'm struggling to come up with a well reasoned argument for this problem.

Let $\tau_1$ be the posteriori probability and let $L(r^*)$ be the risk classifier.

For this scenario, assume:

$X\in\mathbb{X}=[0,1],Y\in\{ 0,1 \}$

$\pi_y=P(Y=y)=1/2$ for $y\in{0,1}$

Now assume $P(Y=1|x)=\tau_1\in[0,1]$ is unknown and the PDFs $f(x|Y=0)$ and $f(x|Y=1)$ are also unknown. In other words the only things that are known is that $f(\centerdot|Y=y):\mathbb{X}\longrightarrow\mathbb{R}$ is a density function on $\mathbb{X}=[0,1]$ for each $y\in\{0,1\}$. In other words $f(x|Y=y)\ge0$ for all $x\in\mathbb{X}$ and $\int_\mathbb{X}f(x|Y=y)dx=1$.

From this information I'd like to deduce the min and max values of $L(r^*)$ and provide conditions on $\tau_1$, $f(\centerdot|Y=0)$ and $f(\centerdot|Y=1)$ in order to yield those values.

kjetil b halvorsen
  • 63,378
  • 26
  • 142
  • 467
  • Take my answer for the first part here: https://stats.stackexchange.com/a/549963/144600 and find the extrema points by derivation and equating to 0. – Spätzle Oct 27 '21 at 08:22
  • 1
    @Spätzle: Please note that we want the OP to add self-study tag themselves, see https://stats.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5611/can-we-resolve-the-lack-of-consensus-about-editors-adding-the-self-study-tag Better to ask a standard comment as I do below – kjetil b halvorsen Oct 27 '21 at 11:44
  • Please add the [tag:self-study] tag & read its [wiki](https://stats.stackexchange.com/tags/self-study/info). Then tell us what you understand thus far, what you've tried & where you're stuck. We'll provide hints to help you get unstuck. Please make these changes as just posting your homework & hoping someone will do it for you is grounds for closing. – kjetil b halvorsen Oct 27 '21 at 11:45
  • @kjetilbhalvorsen this is one question in a series of many by this OP, all with the same setting and an increasing level of abstraction. He/she have made it clear its a class material they didn't manage to understand. – Spätzle Oct 27 '21 at 13:23

0 Answers0