What are the differences in statistical assumptions between a decision tree classification and a LCA classification? Could a decision tree be deployed to do the same work as LCA - why not?
It seems to me that the DT is a lot more explainable, and that what a class constitutes is a lot more intuitive. However, within my field of social science LCA seems to be a lot more prevalent as a method. I'm assuming that a decision tree cannot be said to be able to replace LCA because of this. However, I am unsure as to why this is?