Foreword: I'm going to stick within the context of the textbook. And I will be leaving in a few gaps given that this is a self-study thing. When referring to your textbook, I have the international 6th edition o of the textbook to which I think you are referring. Though there is some discrepancy in the problem you give, and the one I see. The consistency isn't requested.
Let's start with the definition of a consistent estimator. From chapter 4 of the version of the textbook that I am looking:
Let $X$ be a random variable with cdf $F(x,\theta), \theta \in \Omega$. Let $X_1,...,X_n$ be a sample from the distribution of $X$ and let $T_n$ denote a statistic. We say that $T_n$ is a consistent estimator of $\theta$ if $$T_n \mathop\to\limits^P \theta.$$
That is $T_n$ converges in probability to $\theta$.
You have a theorem somewhere in the section on convergence in probability that states if $X_n \mathop \to\limits^P a$ and $g$ is a real and continuous function at $a$, then $g(X_n) \mathop \to\limits^P g(a)$. I think multiplying by a constant counts as a continuous function, if memory serves.
Therefore if you prove $Y$ is consistent for $\theta$, then $Y/\sqrt 2$ is consistent for the median.
Which would mean, according to the definition of convergence in probability, you would have to show $$\lim_{n\to\infty}P(|Y - \theta| < \epsilon) = 1$$
or equivalently
$$\lim_{n\to\infty}P(|Y - \theta| \geq \epsilon) = 0$$ for any $\epsilon >0$. Which doesn't look so bad given the pdf for $Y$ looks relatively straight forward to integrate since it is effectively of the form $\int x^k$. You would "just" need to specify appropriate bound and show the limit trends to 1 or 0 depending on which you choose. The difficulty does not really differ.
This actually isn't too hard of a process as long as you keep tabs on the fact that $P(|Y-\theta|<\epsilon) = P(\theta - Y<\epsilon)$ because of the boundaries on $y$ in the pdf. I forgot about that and ended up down some rabbit hole involving trying to get binomial polynomials to cancel out. I figure I will try to save you the pain by pointing it out.
Side Note: It is tempting to use a corollary in the chapter on MLEs that allows you to say that any MLE is a consistent estimator. However there are regulatory conditions and this distribution violates one of them. The support of the pdf depends on $\theta$.