5

Suppose $X$ and $Y$ are two random variables that have the same distribution. Does

$$P[X \leq t \mid Y=a]$$

be necessarily equal to $$\;\ P[Y \leq t \mid X=a]?$$ Note that if $X$ and $Y$ are bivariate normal with correlation $\rho$ and each is marginally $N(\mu,\sigma^2)$, then it is necessarily true because both conditional distributions would be

$$N(\mu+\rho(a-\mu),(1-\rho^2)\sigma^2).$$

Michael Hardy
  • 7,094
  • 1
  • 20
  • 38
John L
  • 2,140
  • 6
  • 15

4 Answers4

5

A simple counterexample:

$$ P(X = 1, Y = 2) = \frac{1}{3}\\ P(X = 2, Y = 3) = \frac{1}{3}\\ P(X = 3, Y = 1) = \frac{1}{3} $$

Then $P(X \le 1 | Y = 2) = 1$, but $P(Y \le 1 | X = 2) = 0$.

fblundun
  • 3,732
  • 1
  • 5
  • 18
1

How about $X=-Y = \begin{cases} 0 \\ 1 \end{cases}\quad$ each with probability $1/2.$

Michael Hardy
  • 7,094
  • 1
  • 20
  • 38
  • 2
    In this case $X$ is either 0 or 1 and $Y$ is either 0 or -1, so $X$ and $Y$ don't have the same distribution. – fblundun Dec 23 '20 at 23:05
1

There are already answers with simple examples, so why one more? Because it is interesting to look at the general pattern. The wanted property is a kind of symmetry, so we should look for some asymmetrical joint distribution for $X,Y)$. Si if $(X,Y)$ has a permutable distribution in the sense that $(X,Y)$ and $(Y,X)$ have the same distribution, so that for the joint cumulative we have $F(x,y)=F(y,x)$ for all $(x,y)$, then the sought-after property will hold.

Let us use copulas. Let $F$ be the joint cdf (cumulative distribution function) and $$ \DeclareMathOperator{\P}{\mathbb{P}} C(u,v)= \P(F(x) \le u, F(Y)\le v) $$ By the Fréchet–Hoeffding copula bounds (see linked wiki article above) we have $$ W(u,v) \le C(u,v) \le M(u,v) $$ where $W(u,v)= \max(u+v-1,0)$ and $M(u,v)=\min(u,v)$. Both $W,M$ are copulas. $W$ describes the anti-monotonic case $X=U, Y=1-U$ for $U$ some uniform random variable. Now you can check that $W$ gives a counterexample. $M$ corresponds to $X=U, Y=U$ which is not a counterexample.

kjetil b halvorsen
  • 63,378
  • 26
  • 142
  • 467
  • If $X=U$ and $Y=1-U$, then $P[X\le t|Y=a]$ is the same as $P[Y \le t|X=a]$. Both conditional distributions are equal to the distribution of the random variable that takes the value $1-a$ with probability 1. – John L Dec 27 '20 at 21:11
0

Not necessarily true. Let $X$ and $Y$ be discrete random variables that take the values in {1, 2, 3} each with probability $\frac{1}3$; i.e. they have a discrete uniform distribution. Consider the joint probability mass function represented by the matrix below where the element in row $i$ and column $j$ is $P[X=i, Y=j]$:
$$\frac{1}{60}\begin{bmatrix} 3 & 6 & 11 \\ 3 & 12 & 5 \\ 14 & 2 & 4 \end{bmatrix}$$ Note that all rows and columns add up to $\frac{1}3$ and therefore the marginal distributions are the discrete uniform as stated. Now calculate the conditional probability $$P[X\leq2\mid Y=1]=\frac{\frac{3}{60}+\frac{3}{60}}{\frac{3}{60}+\frac{3}{60}+\frac{14}{60}}=\frac{3}{10}.$$ On the other hand, $$P[Y\leq2\mid X=1]=\frac{\frac{3}{60}+\frac{6}{60}}{\frac{3}{60}+\frac{6}{60}+\frac{11}{60}}=\frac{9}{20}.$$

Michael Hardy
  • 7,094
  • 1
  • 20
  • 38
John L
  • 2,140
  • 6
  • 15