2

I'm looking for different real world examples for donut distribution (in the statistic meaning). https://i.stack.imgur.com/VrGq4.jpg

For the most other distributions, I found good examples. But for this the only one is the way to focus a laser beam:

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Donut-shaped-laser-beam-for-thermocapillary-induced-dewetting-a-Microscopic-pictures_fig2_274400395

But this wouldn´t fit to e.g. a classification problem.

Has anybody a good source oder idea, where donut distributions are existing in real world data? Thanks a lot!

  • 1
    FWIW, it looks like by "donut derivation" you might mean a data *distribution* with a multi-modal radial component. Would that be a fair interpretation? – whuber Jul 04 '20 at 15:47
  • @whuber: LOL sorry auto corrections. Of course I mean destribution (like in the jpg). I changed the mistakes – Clemens Drolshagen Jul 04 '20 at 19:17
  • and about your interpretation: I think your naming is correct. I found this distribution in machine learning tutorials and used the name. I´m a market researcher and I never found this destribution in real data, only in dummy data. – Clemens Drolshagen Jul 04 '20 at 20:48

1 Answers1

0

I remember an example of a donut distribution (not a data distribution with a multi-modal radial component if that is what you are looking for) from a course that I took in probabilistic robotics which dealt with Bayes filters, particle filters, Kalman filters, and so on. It might be a bit to specific to this area.

The example is related to a task called localization, which is a setting where you are trying to locate a robot in a certain area. You have access to a map of this area, meaning that you know about specific landmarks on this map. However, you do not know exactly where on the map the robot is so you use the robot's laser to take measurements of distances to landmarks as it moves around in the area. The sensor is a bit noisy and measurements are assumed to have Gaussian noise.

Now, imagine that the robot uses its laser and measures the range $d$ to a known landmark. You use this information to create a posterior belief of the robot's location $p(x, y, \theta|d)$, where x and y are cartesian coordinates, and theta is the angle of the robot relative to the landmark.

Now, after taking this measurement the only information that the robot has is the distance to the landmark. Therefore, it cannot tell what its angle $\theta$ is relative to the landmark and any $\theta$ angle between $[-\pi,\pi]$ would be equally probable. Thus, the robot could be located anywhere at the edge of a circle around the landmark.

When it comes to the (x, y) coordinates we can infer more information. At each point of the circle with radius $d$ we get an error with a Gaussian spread centered at $d$. Such that the robot could be within a certain range inside or outside of the circle. All in all, we get a circle with a Gaussian spread at every single point at its circumference, i.e. a donut.

MarG
  • 115
  • 6
  • Thanks! Not easy to understand, but you are right. So the hole in the middle is more a factor (e.g. the landmark) and the distance from the shape to the center point has a meaning or impact. On a higher level, I can see a donut distribution as a distribution between two not correlated variables (round could) but with an additional factor, which influeced both. Like a map of a forrest around the peak of a mountain: In the middel ( on the peak) is the mountain to high for trees. So the random distribution over the "living zone" is shaped be too warm and to cold. Like the Kilimanjaro (Tansania). – Clemens Drolshagen Jul 05 '20 at 20:24
  • Here you can see what I mean https://www.google.com/maps/place/Kilimandscharo/@-3.0807778,37.348862,69323m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x1839fc5a396ea805:0x8e741c478eea6c01!8m2!3d-3.0674247!4d37.3556273 Or this coral reef: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Great+Barrier+Reef,+Queensland,+Australien/@-20.0193893,150.2451341,8523m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x6bdf1446822c713b:0x192a574136833cda!8m2!3d-18.2870668!4d147.6991918 Perhaps I should train a CNN to search examples in google :-) – Clemens Drolshagen Jul 05 '20 at 20:25