Usually, the prediction interval has this shape in the image.
I don't know why the end of the interval is wider than the center.
Usually, the prediction interval has this shape in the image.
I don't know why the end of the interval is wider than the center.
When performing a linear regression, there are 2 types of uncertainty in the prediction.
First is the prediction of the overall mean of the estimate (ie the center of the fit). The second is the uncertainly in the estimate calculating the slope.
Thus when you combine both uncertainties of the prediction there is a spread between the high and low estimates. Then as further away from the center, uncertainty of the slope becomes a large and more noticeable factor, thus the limits widen.
Hope this answers your question.
Its very easy to determine the prediction interval for the data.
$$\operatorname{Var}(y) = \operatorname{Var}(\beta_0 + \beta_1 x) + \operatorname{Var}(\varepsilon) = \sigma^2_{\beta_0} + \sigma^2_{\beta_1}x^2 + 2x \operatorname{Cov}(\beta_0, \beta_1)+ \sigma^2_{\epsilon}$$
As you can see, this is a quadratic function in x, which means for larger values of $x$ (well...larger as compared to the sample mean of $x$), the variance of the prediction will be larger.
This reference, for example, clearly gives the formula of a prediction interval for a simple linear regression model, which contains the expression:
$\sqrt{({1/n + (x_p - x_m)^2}/{(n-1){s_x}^2}}$
So, as the prediction for the explanatory variable $x_p$ becomes more removed from its mean $x_m$, the interval widens.
In practice, I would be cautious about applying the prediction interval far from the mean, particularly a point estimate not included in the observed range of the data, as the structural equation itself may no longer be accurate/valid.