Convention for symbols indicating statistical significance?

Question

This question might probably also fit into Academia.SX. I'm writing my first paper in life sciences and I'm very often seeing asterisks as indicators for statistical significance (*).

I'm wondering if there's a convention on which symbol, and how many of them are to be used to indicate what the significance is, e.g. * for p < 0.05 and *** for p < 0.001?

score 10 · Accepted Answer · answered Nov 16 '12 at 19:25

10

Following is the convention:

ns      P > 0.05
*       P ≤ 0.05
**      P ≤ 0.01
***     P ≤ 0.001
****    P ≤ 0.0001

answered Nov 16 '12 at 19:25

abhinavkulkarni

778
1
6
15

score 7 · Answer 2 · answered Nov 01 '12 at 12:43

7

The convention is...

* yay, I can publish
** yay, I can publish and not get refuted
*** I have no idea what alpha means
**** my power is unfathomable
***** graphing the data and noting r = 0.98 wasn't good enough

Also, see the references in chi's answer.

answered Nov 01 '12 at 12:43

John

21,167
9
48
84

7

Because significance testing leads to so many problems let's convert to using skull and crossbones. – Frank Harrell Nov 01 '12 at 13:11

score 6 · Answer 3 · edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:44

6

This is correct, but please don't fall in the trap of the star system: The Earth Is Round, p < .05 :-)

edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:44

Community

1

answered Nov 01 '12 at 11:46

chl

50,972
18
205
364

Convention for symbols indicating statistical significance?

3 Answers3

Linked