It is (nearly) a noncentral chi-squared distribution by definition.
The difference is in a scaling factor.
Definitions
Both the central and noncentral chi-squared distribution with $n$ degrees of freedom are the distribution of the sum of the squares of $n$ independent distributed normal distributed variables.
$$\sum_{i=1}^{n} X_i^2$$
- For the (central) chi-squared distribution you have $$X_i \sim N(0,1)$$.
- For the noncentral chi-squared distribution you have $$X_i \sim N(\mu_i,1)$$ and $\lambda = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \mu_i^2$ is the non-centrality parameter.
Transformation
For more general variables $X_i \sim N(\mu_i,\sigma_i^2)$ you have that
$$\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{X_i^2}{\sigma_i^2} \sim \chi^2 \left( n,\sum_i (\mu_i / \sigma_i)^2 \right)$$
is a noncentral chi-squared distributed variable. So your case is a transformed version of it:
$$\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n X_i^2 = \frac{\sigma^2}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{X_i^2}{\sigma_i^2}$$
The actual distribution function
Getting the actual expression for the distribution of the noncentral chi-squared distribution is not as easy as for the central chi-squared distribution (which can be derived easily using symmetry arguments). It will eventually be represented in terms of analytical functions (e.g. the modified Bessel function of the first kind).