I am confused about this. Are they the same? There are some problems in which I am asked to find the Uniformly Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimator (UMVUE) first and then check if it achieves the CRLB. Yet from what I've read, I understand that an unbiased estimator that achieves CRLB is UMVUE. Thanks.
Asked
Active
Viewed 2,237 times
2
-
https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/436384/when-cant-cramer-rao-lower-bound-be-reached?rq=1 – StubbornAtom Jan 13 '20 at 16:29
1 Answers
4
They are not the same. Achieving the CR lower bound is a sufficient condition for an unbiased estimator to be UMVUE. However, it is not necessary.
For example, Example 3.10 in this link gives an estimator that is UMVUE (by the Lehmann-Scheffe theorem) but does not attain the CR Lower bound.

Flowsnake
- 783
- 3
- 12
-
Is there a general procedure for finding UMVUEs without the use of CRLB? – user164144 Jul 06 '17 at 01:02
-
1@user164144 Yes, if the unbiased estimator is a function of a complete sufficient statistic, then it is the UMVUE. This is the Lehmann-Scheffe theorem. In particular, let $T$ be a complete sufficient statistic and $S$ an unbiased estimator. Then $E[S | T]$ gives the UMVUE. – Flowsnake Jul 06 '17 at 01:03