1

When one runs an OLS regression, one often prefers to look at $R^2$ rather than the mean squared error, though both measure goodness of fit. $R^2$ is dimensionless and has some advantageous properties: for example, it's related to other important quantities such as correlation, and it behaves nicely if you scale or translate your data.

When I run an LAD regression, I can look at the sum of absolute errors or the mean absolute error or something. But is there a different statistic, something like $R^2$, that people tend to look at instead?

amoeba
  • 93,463
  • 28
  • 275
  • 317
kuzzooroo
  • 111
  • 2
  • I've seen in the past measures like $\sum |\text{residual}|/ \sum |\text{ response} - \text{median of response}|$ but no-one is obliged to take them too seriously. – Nick Cox Sep 22 '16 at 14:40

0 Answers0