0

Consider a set of $100$ people, for each person we have 4 values which are: weight, height, age and the value of a medical exam, which will be called "A" for simplicity. I want to compute the correlation between weight and A, height and A and age and A.

Should I use one or two sided Pearson coefficient?

I computed the Pearson coefficient with the excel function (which I imagine is 1-sided) and the highest coefficient (all coefficients are >0) was the one of weight-A, about 0,077. But then I computed the 2-sided Pearson value with the help of this site http://www.wessa.net/rwasp_kendall.wasp#output and the coefficient of weight-A is the lowest (all coefficients are positive), the highest was the one of age-A, about 0,578.

What does it mean? Which coefficient should I consider?

Thank you

user61720
  • 101
  • Is this related to a question asked earlier today, [Correlation indexes in medicine](http://stats.stackexchange.com/q/219644/7290)? If so, please don't re-ask your question multiple times. – gung - Reinstate Monica Jun 19 '16 at 23:05
  • Your question unclear. How is a correlation intended to be "one-sided" or "two-sided"? – Glen_b Jun 20 '16 at 00:47

1 Answers1

0

Pearson correlation coefficient it's just one coefficient - the "one sided" or "two sided" are different ways of testing hyphotesis. This correlation estimator is suitable for continuous variables. In this case, if the value of a medical exam is measured in a continuous scale, then it is correct to use Pearson.

But if the results of the exam are coded in an ordinal scale, like "low", "medium" and "high"; then you should use Kendall coefficient.

In any case, when interpreting a correlation you should mention first its direction - positive or negative, and then its intensity, based on the p-value provided in your link (if it's larger than 0.05 then it is not significant) or based on your previuos knowledge on the subject.

Camila Burne
  • 167
  • 7
  • The answer is pretty old, but I'm curious about the actual source of this advice (book, article, paper, etc.). – surlac Jul 08 '21 at 06:35
  • 1
    Hi there @surlac! Right now I don't recall the source... it's from my notes after taking this course: https://www.fcecon.unr.edu.ar/web-nueva/sites/default/files/u10/Estadistica/metodos_no_parametricos.pdf if you go to page 3, under "BIBLIOGRAFÍA" you'll see the reading material (in English). – Camila Burne Jul 14 '21 at 17:05