3

I am testing the OLS assumptions and I got the following normal P-P plot. Does it look normally distributed or not?

enter image description here

gung - Reinstate Monica
  • 132,789
  • 81
  • 357
  • 650
user89313
  • 61
  • 4

2 Answers2

5

This looks fine to me, as far as that goes. What you are most concerned about is the tails of your distribution, and pp-plots don't show those very well. QQ-plots do better; see: PP-plots vs. QQ-plots.

gung - Reinstate Monica
  • 132,789
  • 81
  • 357
  • 650
0

There are formal tests for normality- in particular the Jarque-Bera/Skewness-Kurtosis type tests.

ChinG
  • 741
  • 8
  • 24
  • 1
    Jarque-Bera as I have seen it implemented uses asymptotic results for every sample size, a very bad idea as the convergence of sample skewness and kurtosis to normality is very slow indeed. – Nick Cox Nov 03 '15 at 19:21
  • is a K-S test better? – ChinG Nov 03 '15 at 19:29
  • 2
    Not to me. Almost none of these tests can possibly compare with a Q-Q plot, which shows you how much and where data depart from normality. A K-S test is arguably most sensitive in the middle of the distribution, precisely where departures are least important. Cf. @gung's comments. – Nick Cox Nov 03 '15 at 19:32