2

Let $X_1$ and $X_2$ be independent, normal distributed random variables with equal mean $\mu$ but non-equal standard deviations $\sigma_1$ and $\sigma_2$.

Suppose I know $\sigma_1$ and $\sigma_2$ and I have $n$ samples $x_{11},\ldots,x_{1n}$ from $X_1$ and m samples $x_{21}, \ldots, x_{2m}$ from $X_2$, what is the best estimator for $\mu$? What is its distribution?

(edit: I'm mainly interested in the n=1, m=1 case)

Frank Meulenaar
  • 257
  • 2
  • 9

1 Answers1

7

This is analogous to fixed-effect meta-analysis. The best (minimum-variance unbiased) estimator would be the inverse-variance weighted mean $$\hat{\mu} = \frac{ \frac{1}{\sigma_1^2} \sum x_{1i} + \frac{1}{\sigma_2^2} \sum x_{2i} }{n/\sigma_1^2 + m/\sigma_2^2}$$

When $n=m=1$ that reduces to $$\hat{\mu} = \frac{ x_{11} / \sigma_1^2 + x_{21} / \sigma_2^2 }{1/\sigma_1^2 + 1/\sigma_2^2}$$ The distribution of $\hat\mu$ is normal with mean $\mu$ and variance $\frac{ 1 }{n/\sigma_1^2 + m/\sigma_2^2}$.

onestop
  • 16,816
  • 2
  • 53
  • 83