3

Why don't we use restricted maximum likelihood to estimate parameters in non-mixed models?

Tim
  • 108,699
  • 20
  • 212
  • 390
mackbox
  • 443
  • 2
  • 8
  • 3
    You use it: REML is for estimating variance parameters, and in non-mixed models there is only one such, $\sigma^2$. When dividing by $n-1$ to get a variance estimate, you are using REML. See http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/48671/what-is-restricted-maximum-likelihood-and-when-should-it-be-used – kjetil b halvorsen May 04 '15 at 17:02

1 Answers1

3

For REML under fixed effects the variance estimator equivalent to $S^2=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n (y_i - x_i \hat{\beta})^2}{n-p}$ where $\hat{\beta}$ is the OLS estimator, but as a bonus with OLS you also get to use Gauss-Markov Theorem for $\hat{\beta}$.

With REML you don't get any coefficient estimates.

Jonathan Lisic
  • 1,342
  • 7
  • 16