If your prior belief is that $\theta$ is exactly 0.036, then there is no point in using Beta distribution - use this value. However, I imagine that your prior belief is that $\theta$ is approximately this value. The question is however, how much informative do you want your Beta distribution to be? Do you want it to be sharply peaked at 0.036 (very informative) or very flat but slightly centered at this value? Choosing sharply peaked distribution would lead you to very informative prior, while using flat distribution to weakly informative prior. Asymmetric distribution leads to informative prior that "points" in some direction, i.e. says that you assume that the values are "rather higher" or "rather lower" then some value. If you answer yourself those questions it would be easier to pick the values for $a$ and $b$ parameters.
Consider that mean for Beta distribution is:
$$\frac{a}{a+b}$$
so you have to choose any values for $a$ and $b$ that give $a / (a+b) = 0.036$. There are multiple such values so it is a matter of your subjective choice.
What you can find helpful is this toy function that lets you play with the parameters and see how does the distribution change (it needs RStudio and manipulate
library):
library(manipulate)
x <- seq(0, 1, by=0.01)
manipulate(
{ ci <- qbeta(c(0.05, .5, 0.95), alpha, beta)
plot(x, dbeta(x, alpha, beta),
col="blue", lwd=2, type="l", las=1, bty="n",
ylab="density", xlab="", ylim=c(0, 5.5),
main="Beta distribution")
box()
mtext(paste(c("95% CI:", round(ci, 2)),
collapse=" "), cex=0.8, side=3)
if (printci) abline(v=ci, lty=c(3,2,3))
},
alpha=slider(0.001, 10, step=0.001, initial=1),
beta=slider(0.001, 10, step=0.001, initial=1),
printci=checkbox(TRUE, "Show 95% CI"))
It is limited since it has fixed boundaries for $a$ and $b$ (you can change them), but should give you the feeling on how does Beta parameters relate to each other.
Spiegelhalter (2004) (or his book) gives nice examples of using priors for testing different hypothesis about the data.