I have 7 different groups of playing time data that is not normal.
Lets say its really not normal..like a lot.
The variance is also not equal and fails the bartlett test by a landslide.
Sample size is quite big, around 7000, but different sizes.
Am I better off with the Kruskal-Wallis test that does not need the normal distribution or better off with the Welch-ANOVA that does not need equal variances?
I should add that I am interested in shifts of the mean or median.. the question is if players in group 1 play longer than in group 2.
Is any of the two half way valid? Are there better alternatives?
Here are some pics of the data:
from this qqplot and histogram all the groups look kinda similar.
skewness calculations are all way above 1 as are kurtosis and all the test are significantly not normal (although most data probably is with that samplesize)
I have no experience to just look at data and see if its normal enough or whatever.