Questions tagged [aquinas]

St. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274), scholastic philosopher, Catholic theologian, and most famous commentator on Aristotle. Thomism is his school of thought.

St. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274), scholastic philosopher, Catholic theologian, and well-known commentator on Aristotle. Thomism is the name for the school of thought derived from his works in philosophy and theology.

134 questions
20
votes
15 answers

If the universe has a beginning does that prove God exists?

It is curious to note that a eminent Physicist like Stephen Hawking thinks the universe has a beginning. This has some rather startling Religious implications You can find the link here: http://www.hawking.org.uk/the-beginning-of-time.html Now let…
16
votes
1 answer

Is transubstantiation faithfully Aristotelian?

Transubstantiation is a concept that Roman Catholic scholastics, most notably Thomas Aquinas, developed for the doctrine of Communion. Catholics state that when a priest blesses the elements of bread and wine, they become the body and blood of…
Mr. Bultitude
  • 319
  • 4
  • 13
13
votes
3 answers

How can souls and angels be pure forms if only matter undergoes change?

In Thomas Aquinas' philosophy, angels are conceived as pure forms without any matter, like God, but contrary to God they still possess potentiality. Although there is no composition of matter and form in an angel, yet there is act and…
viuser
  • 5,339
  • 2
  • 19
  • 56
13
votes
2 answers

How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?

This question became a symbol for the silly and pointless sophistry of medieval scholastics. But as modern scholarship has shown scholastics was not such a thoughtless desert as some of its caricatures: the role of Duns Scotus and Ockham in the…
Conifold
  • 44,610
  • 4
  • 100
  • 187
9
votes
5 answers

What does Dawkins suggest is the main flaw in these three arguments from Aquinas?

Source: p 100-101, The God Delusion, By Richard Dawkins 1. The Unmoved Mover. Nothing moves without a prior mover. This leads us to an infinite regress, from which the only escape is God. Something had to make the first move, and that…
user8572
8
votes
6 answers

How to understand Prime matter?

In the Aristotle-Aquinas tradition prime matter is the thing that underlies all material things. It is described as completely indeterminate-pure potentiality. Aristotle held that it was not created and cannot be destroyed. Aquinas understands it to…
ArAj
  • 941
  • 1
  • 4
  • 9
8
votes
1 answer

What is the agent intellect according to Avicenna and Aquinas?

Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas seem to generally interpret Aristotle in different ways, and I am trying to understand the differences. Specifically, what are the differences between Avicenna's view and Thomas Aquinas' on agent intellect?
keramus
  • 273
  • 1
  • 3
  • 7
7
votes
2 answers

What does Aquinas mean in this passage from Summa Theologica responding to the claim that goodness is prior to being?

In his article on goodness in general, Summa Theologica I q. 5 a. 2, Aquinas considers the question of whether goodness is prior in idea to being. He is responding to the following objection (arg. 1): It seems that goodness is prior in idea to…
7
votes
2 answers

Did Thomas Aquinas state randomness as a prerequisite of free will?

I was told the other day that in one work on free will, Thomas Aquinas suggested that some randomness / non-determinism was a prerequisite for its existence. Does any one know where he expressed this idea? Did he? It doesn't sound like his sort of…
N. McA.
  • 173
  • 4
7
votes
4 answers

If God is pure act of being, where does the essence of being come from?

According to the Thomistic view in Ontology, essence and 'the act of being' (I'm translating from a romance language) are different, in which 'to be' is the act received by the essence, which is the potency that limits the act of being. So, my…
6
votes
1 answer

Does the act-potency distinction lead to Meinong's jungle?

The Aristotelian-Thomistic distinction of act-potency is, among other things, supposed to solve Parmenides' paradoxes of change. Since change requires something non-existent popping into existence ex nihilo (as far as I can tell, this is the case…
Adam Sharpe
  • 3,917
  • 2
  • 13
  • 39
6
votes
4 answers

Where did Suárez say the principle of non-contradiction does not apply to the Trinity?

Fr. Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., says, in Le Sens du Mystère et le Clair-Obscur Intellectuel: Nature et Surnaturel p. 128 fn. 1 (Engl. transl. p. 142 fn. 41): St. Thomas never would have admitted like Suarez that the principle of contradiction…
Geremia
  • 9,126
  • 4
  • 31
  • 66
6
votes
2 answers

According to St. Thomas Aquinas, do "being" (ens) and "truth" (verum) differ?

In his Disputed Questions on Truth q. 1 a. 1 arg. 3, St. Thomas Aquinas presents an argument against "that the true (verum) is exactly the same as being (ens)": 3. Things which differ conceptually [ratione or "in reason"] are so related to each…
6
votes
3 answers

How can Aquinas' argument from motion to mover be reconciled with Newton's law of inertia?

A common objection to Thomas Aquinas' first way, the argument from motion (which means rather something like change), is that the second premise is flawed: It is certain, and evidence to our senses, that some things are in motion. Now whatever is…
viuser
  • 5,339
  • 2
  • 19
  • 56
5
votes
0 answers

Seeking insights on the origin of the term "Peripatetic Axiom"

I have been researching the origins of the "Peripatetic Axiom," which states that nothing is in the mind that was not first in the senses. While I understand that this principle was first formulated by Aristotle and later expounded upon by Aquinas,…
cricket900
  • 329
  • 1
  • 2
1
2 3
8 9