Questions tagged [group-actions]

Use with the (group-theory) tag. Groups describe the symmetries of an object through their actions on the object. For example, dihedral groups of order $2n$ act on regular $n$-gons, $S_n$ acts on the numbers $\{1, 2, \ldots, n\}$ and the Rubik's cube group acts on Rubik's cube.

Groups describe the symmetries of an object through their actions on the object. For example, dihedral groups of order $2n$ act on regular $n$-gons, $S_n$ acts on the numbers $\{1, 2, \ldots, n\}$ and the Rubik's cube group acts on Rubik's cube.

When describing a group action, it should be clear whether the action is a left action or a right action. A right action is a function,

$\cdot : X\times G\rightarrow X$

such that $x\cdot 1=x$ for all $x\in X$ and such that $(x\cdot g)\cdot h=x\cdot (gh)$. These conditions mean the action of the group makes sense; that the action is compatible with the group.

A left action is defined analogously.

If $G$ acts on $X$ then there exists a homomorphism of groups $G\rightarrow \operatorname{Aut}(X)$. This is of interest when $X$ is a group too, and allows us to construct semidirect products of groups.

For more details, see Wikipedia.

2887 questions
98
votes
2 answers

Geometric way to view the truncated braid groups?

This is perhaps a vague question, but hopefully there exists literature on the subject. The question is motivated by an answer I gave to this question. I also asked a related question on MO, although hopefully this question should be easier. There…
71
votes
0 answers

Is there a "ping-pong lemma proof" that $\langle x \mapsto x+1,x \mapsto x^3 \rangle$ is a free group of rank 2?

Let $f,g\colon \mathbb R \to \mathbb R$ be the permutations defined by $f\colon x \mapsto x+1$ and $g\colon x \mapsto x^3$, or maybe even have $g\colon x \mapsto x^p$, $p$ an odd prime. In the book, by Pierre de la Harpe, Topics in Geometric Group…
52
votes
8 answers

Intuitive definitions of the Orbit and the Stabilizer

I don't fully understand the definition of an Orbit. Mathematically, it is given by $$ \operatorname{Orb}(x) = \{y = gx \mid g \in G\} $$ where $G$ is a group and $x \in X$, a set that is acted upon by the group $G$, but what does this actually…
Kaish
  • 5,930
  • 11
  • 50
  • 90
31
votes
2 answers

$Q_8$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $S_8$, but not isomorphic to a subgroup of $S_n$ for $n\leq 7$.

Question is to prove that : $Q_8$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $S_8$, but not isomorphic to a subgroup of $S_n$ for $n\leq 7$. I see that $Q_8$ is isomorphic to subgroup of $S_8$ by left multiplication action. Hint given was to prove that…
user87543
29
votes
1 answer

Prove that the map $\phi:S^3\times S^3\to{\bf GL}(4,\Bbb R)$ defined via quaternions as$\phi(p,q)(v)=pvq^{-1}$ has image ${\bf SO}(4)$

I am interested in the map $\phi:S^3 \times S^3 \to GL_4(\mathbb{R})$ given as follows: Let $(p,q) \in S^3 \times S^3$. We identify $p$ and $q$ as real quaternions with unit norms and define $\phi(p,q)$ to be the map sending $v \in \mathbb{H}$ to…
28
votes
6 answers

Importance of group action in abstract algebra

What are the important consequences of group action in abstract algebra? Why the action of a group on a set is defined?
Prince Khan
  • 1,514
  • 11
  • 21
25
votes
3 answers

How much of a group $G$ is determined by the category of $G$-sets?

Suppose $G$ and $H$ are groups and we have an equivalence of categories between $G\textrm{-}\mathbf{Set}$ and $H\textrm{-}\mathbf{Set}$. (One can think of this as a form of "nonlinear Morita equivalence".) What can be said about $G$ and $H$? I…
20
votes
1 answer

Permutation of cosets

Let $G$ be a finite group and $\gamma \in \text{Sym}(G)$ such that $\gamma (1) = 1$ and $\gamma (gH) = \gamma (g)H$ for all $g\in G$ and $H\leq G$. This means $\gamma$ induces a permutation of the left cosets of any subgroup of $G$. I need to…
19
votes
1 answer

Clarification of notion of proper group action.

In a course on differential manifolds and Lie groups, the following theorem was stated, though never proven: Let $M$ and $N$ be smooth manifolds, and suppose $G$ is a Lie group acting on $M$. If the group action is free and proper, then $M/G$ has a…
Vishesh
  • 3,047
  • 1
  • 20
  • 36
18
votes
1 answer

Is the Structure Group of a Fibre Bundle Well-Defined?

Am I right in thinking that the structure group of a fibre bundle is any group $G$ of homeomorphisms of the fibre $F$ such that all transition functions map into $G$? Or is $G$ somehow the minimal such group, for all possible trivialisations?…
Edward Hughes
  • 5,045
  • 3
  • 32
  • 64
18
votes
5 answers

What about linearity makes it so useful?

Among all areas of mathematics, linear algebra is incredibly well understood. I have heard it said that the only problems we can really solve in math are linear problems- and that much of the rest of math involves reducing problems to linear…
msm
  • 2,664
  • 1
  • 11
  • 22
18
votes
3 answers

What does an outer automorphism look like?

I am working on a project in my group theory class to find an outer automorphism of $S_6$, which has already been addressed at length on this site and others. I have a prescription for how to go about finding this guy, but I have a larger conceptual…
18
votes
3 answers

Show that any abelian transitive subgroup of $S_n$ has order $n$

Can anybody tell me what is known about the classification of abelian transitive groups of the symmetric groups? Let $G$ be a an abelian transitive subgroup of the symmetric group $S_n$. Show that $G$ has order $n$. Thanks for your help!
17
votes
2 answers

Orbits of vectors under the action of $\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb Q)$

Context. While working on a larger proof, I would love to have the following lemma, but I can't even decide if it's true or not. The question. We consider the action of $\mathrm {GL}_n(\mathbb Q)$ on $\mathbb R^n$ such that $\varphi\cdot…
17
votes
1 answer

Grothendieck's Galois theory: fundamental theorem

I've been learning about Grothendieck's Galois theory, and I just haven't been able to understand the fundamental theorem properly. Let's phrase the fundamental theorem in the case of fields: Let $k$ be a field, and $k_s$ its separable closure.…
SdV
  • 1,015
  • 6
  • 15
1
2 3
99 100