Questions tagged [compactification]

Use this tag for questions about making a topological space into a compact space.

In general topology, compactification is the process or result of making a topological space into a compact space. Formally, an embedding of a topological space X as a dense subset of a compact space is called a compactification of X.

It is often useful to embed topological spaces in compact spaces because they have special properties. Methods of compactification control points from "going off to infinity" by in some way adding "points at infinity" or preventing such an "escape."

For any topological space X the (Alexandroff) one-point compactification αX of X is obtained by adding an extra point ∞ (often called a point at infinity) and defining the open sets of the new space to be the open sets of X together with the sets of the form G ∪ {∞} where G is an open subset of X such that X \ G is compact. The one-point compactification of X is Hausdorff if and only if X is Hausdorff and locally compact.

Of particular interest are Hausdorff compactifications, i.e., compactifications in which the compact space is Hausdorff. A topological space has a Hausdorff compactification if and only if it is Tychonoff. If so, there is a unique (up to homeomorphism) "most general" Hausdorff compactification, the Stone-Čech compactification of X, denoted by βX; formally, that exhibits the category of compact Hausdorff spaces and continuous maps as a reflective subcategory of the category of Tychonoff spaces and continuous maps.

"Most general," or, formally, "reflective," means that the space βX is characterized by the universal property that any continuous function from X to a compact Hausdorff space K can be extended uniquely to a continuous function from βX to K. More explicitly, βX is a compact Hausdorff space containing X such that the induced topology on X by βX is the same as the given topology on X, and for any continuous map f : XK where K is a compact Hausdorff space, there is a unique continuous map g : βXK for which g restricted to X is identically f.

The Stone-Čech compactification can be constructed as follows: let C be the set of continuous functions from X to the closed interval [0,1]. Then each point in X can be identified with an evaluation function on C. Thus X can be identified with a subset of [0,1]$^C$, the space of all functions from C to [0,1]. Because the latter is compact by Tychonoff's theorem, the closure of X as a subset of that space is also compact.

285 questions
37
votes
1 answer

When is Stone-Čech compactification the same as one-point compactification?

For the space $\omega_1$ (with the order topology) we have $\beta\omega_1=\omega_1+1$ (or $\beta[0,\omega_1)=[0,\omega_1]$, if you prefer this notation), i.e., it is an example of a space for which Stone-Čech compactification and one-point…
24
votes
3 answers

Showing one point compactification is unique up to homeomorphism

First for clarity I'll define things as I'm familiar with them: A compactification of a non-compact topological space $X$ is a compact topological space $Y$ such that $X$ can be densley embedded in $Y$ . In particular a compacitifaction is said to…
Serpahimz
  • 3,685
  • 21
  • 49
13
votes
1 answer

Extending open maps to Stone-Čech compactifications

Let $X$ be a Čech-complete space, and $Y$ a paracompact space. Suppose $f\colon X\to Y$ is a continuous and open surjection. Since $Y$ is completely regular we have that $\beta(Y)$ is homeomorphic to $Y$ as a dense subset of $\beta Y$ (the…
Asaf Karagila
  • 383,350
  • 44
  • 582
  • 980
12
votes
1 answer

Number of homeomorphism types of separable closed subspaces of $\beta \mathbb N$.

When thinking about subalgebras of $\ell_\infty$, the algebra of bounded, scalar-valued, I came across the following question related to counting subalgebras with weak*-separable dual ball obtainable by restricting to closed subsets of the spectrum…
Tomasz Kania
  • 15,884
  • 1
  • 29
  • 65
11
votes
2 answers

Analytic Applications of Stone-Čech compactification

Following Bredon's Topology and Geometry, we let $\mathcal{F}$ be the set of all continuous maps $f:X \to [0,1]$ on a completely regular space $X$, define $X \xrightarrow{\Phi} [0,1]^{\mathcal{F}}$ by setting $\Phi(x)(f)=f(x)$ for each $x \in X$ and…
11
votes
1 answer

Why does $\mathbb{N}$ have only two topological compactifications?

Definition: A compactification $\gamma X$ of a space $X$ is said to be a topological compactification if all autohomeomorphisms of the space $X$ can be continuously extended to a mapping of $\gamma X$ into $\gamma X$. The space $\mathbb{N}$ with its…
11
votes
3 answers

Show that the Stone–Čech compactification $\beta \mathbb{Z}$ is not metrizable.

Show that the Stone–Čech compactification $\beta \mathbb{Z}$ is not metrizable (here $\mathbb{Z}$ denotes the set of integer numbers in discrete topology). Definition. Let $X$ be a completely regular space. We say $\beta (X)$ is a *Stone–Čech…
10
votes
1 answer

Is one-point compactification of a space metrizable

Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space.Let $Y$ be the one-point compactification of $X$. Two questions are: Is it true that if $X$ has a countable basis then $Y$ is metrizable? Is it true that if $Y$ is metrizable then $X$ has a countable…
9
votes
1 answer

Why is adjoining a unit the algebraic counterpart to the one point compactification?

There is an interesting relation in which the action of adjoining a unit to an algebra and the one-point compactification come together: Let $X$ be a non compact but locally compact Hausdorff space and let $C_0(X)$ denote the non-unital algebra of…
8
votes
1 answer

Example 4, Sec. 29, in Munkres' TOPOLOGY, 2nd ed: How is the one-point compactification of the real line homeomorphic with the circle?

Here is Theorem 29.1 in the book Topology by James R. Munkres, 2nd edition: Let $X$ be a [topological] space. Then $X$ is locally compact Hausdorff if and only if there exists a [topological] space $Y$ satisfying the following conditions: (1) $X$…
Saaqib Mahmood
  • 25,356
  • 14
  • 60
  • 207
8
votes
2 answers

Intuition for the Stone-Čech compactification via ultrafilters

Definitions used: Given some set $X$, denote by $\beta X$ the set of ultrafilters on $X$. We can view $X$ as a subset of $\beta X$ by identifying each point $x \in X$ with the principal ultrafilter associated to $x$. Further, the collection of all…
Jack
  • 135
  • 1
  • 4
7
votes
1 answer

Examples for Stone–Čech compactification

I'm finding it a bit though to "feel" this topic of Stone–Čech compactification. For example, I want to show that $[0,1]$ is not a Stone–Čech compactification of $(0,1]$ and on the other hand $\omega_1^*$ is a Stone–Čech compactification of…
Marik S.
  • 761
  • 3
  • 18
7
votes
1 answer

ultrafilter convergence versus non-standard topology

I have recently been reading about the non-standard characterisation of topological spaces, by saying which points of ${^*X}$ are infinitesimally close to which standard points. The theory looks a lot like that of ultrafilter convergence. Let me…
7
votes
2 answers

Is $[0,1]$ the Stone-Čech compactification of $(0,1)$?

In this note by G. Eric Moorhouse, which appears to be some course notes handout, it is stated on page 3: The [two-point] above is the Stone-Čech compactification of $(0,1)≃\mathbb{R}$;that is, $\beta\mathbb{R} ≃ [0, 1]$. This is the most general…
John Daniels
  • 195
  • 1
  • 6
7
votes
1 answer

Are compact subsets closed in the one-point compactification of $\mathbb{Q}$?

Let $\omega\mathbb{Q}$ denote the one-point compactification of $\mathbb{Q}$, where $\omega$ is a point not in $\mathbb{Q}$, and define a topology $\tau$ on $\omega\mathbb{Q}$ by $$ \tau=\{U\subseteq \mathbb{Q}\ |\ U\text{ is open in…
1
2 3
18 19