113

Last semester I picked up an algebra course at my university, which unfortunately was scheduled during my exams of my major (I'm a computer science major). So I had to self study the material, however, the self written syllabus was not self study friendly (good syllabus overall though).

The course was split up into 3 parts, group theory, ring theory and field theory. As a computer science major we only had to study the first 2.

Now that I passed the exam for this course I want to study the field theory part ( which covers Galois theory, etc).

So, now I want to ask whether any of you know any good books on abstract algebra, which lift off at basic ring theory and continue to more advanced ring theory and to finite fields, Galois theory, ...

Please keep in mind that I am not a math major, and that I would like books which are suited for self study (thus a lot of examples and intuition).

Thanks in advance!

Belgi
  • 22,578
  • 17
  • 91
  • 156
sxd
  • 3,464
  • 5
  • 26
  • 38
  • 4
    I have converted the question to [community wiki](http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11740/what-are-community-wiki-posts/11741#11741), as it's asking for a list of suggestions and there is no single right answer. – Zev Chonoles Aug 01 '11 at 00:39
  • 7
    I think *Topics in Algebra* by I.N. Herstein is an excellent algebra text. – Amitesh Datta Aug 01 '11 at 01:39
  • 2
    @Amitesh I first learned algebra from the outstanding Herstein and it's awesome exercises, so it'll always have a special place in my heart despite it's old-fashioned approach. – Mathemagician1234 Nov 25 '11 at 07:49
  • Almost the question was being addressed in https://sbseminar.wordpress.com/2012/10/25/rant-to-me-about-algebra-books/ – Fizz Apr 11 '15 at 19:41
  • Also on the topic of Galois theory there's a [intro video course by Matthew Salomone](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-5Av1KC11w). It looks pretty well put together. Actually it reviews enough group theory to even be a decent intro to that topic too. – Fizz Apr 11 '15 at 20:31
  • Someone has to say Lang! Just kidding though, that's not a good book for study, though the problems are nice. I'm not in love with any algebra book out there. Maybe I should write one? I learned from Lang, Artin, Rotman, etc. Exposing yourself to a variety of views is a good idea. – Justin Young Feb 26 '16 at 16:14

12 Answers12

41

There's always the classic Abstract Algebra by Dummit and Foote. Section II of the text gives a nice treatment of ring theory, certainly providing plenty of review for what you have already covered while introducing more advanced concepts of ring theory. Section III will cover the field and Galois theory you're interested in. Some of the exercises can be difficult at times, especially for self-study, but the authors tend to give a number of examples and always provide the motivation for why they are doing what they are doing.

Michael Banaszek
  • 937
  • 1
  • 7
  • 13
  • 2
    As it contains no answers to the exercises, do you think it is still suitable for self study? – sxd Aug 01 '11 at 00:53
  • 2
    From my experience, most of the exercises are not so difficult that you would need solutions. Those examples that further the development of the theory often either have very good hints or are broken down into smaller, more managable problems (often with hints too!). However, there are solutions (or at least sketches) available on the internet for most of the exercises anyway. It may not be the easiest text available, but I think it is one of the best for a first course. – Michael Banaszek Aug 01 '11 at 00:59
  • 1
    Thanks for your response in the first place. Are there plenty of examples in the book present? This is something where my syllabus clearly lacks! – sxd Aug 01 '11 at 01:10
  • When I was reading through it, I very rarely found myself wanting an example of a topic or technique and not being able to find one. In general, any time they mention _anything_ they give at least one example of it, though more often than not they'll give three or four. They also constantly provide motivation as to why you are learning any given topic, so very rarely will you ever finish a section wondering why you had to study it. – Michael Banaszek Aug 01 '11 at 02:42
  • 1
    If you miss solutions to a particular problem, I can recommend using IRC. Both Freenode and EFNet have excellent #math channels with plenty of people happy to help with details. – Tobias Kildetoft Aug 01 '11 at 09:25
  • 2
    I don't know why,but this book has always annoyed me. It seems like a bloated version of Herstein, except it lacks Herstein's depth and clarity. And the categorical/functorial material seems forced and tacked on. – Mathemagician1234 Nov 25 '11 at 07:52
  • 2
    There is nothing classic about D&F . – Zee Dec 14 '17 at 13:12
31

Fraleigh's "A First Course in Abstract Algebra, 7th Edition" is a good book for self study. It is easy and good for the beginners, and it has a complete solution manual written by the author.

Gobi
  • 7,238
  • 5
  • 46
  • 96
20

Try Contemporary Abstract Algebra. This one, I think, has lots of nice examples. The following is from Googlebooks:

"Contemporary Abstract Algebra 7/e provides a solid introduction to the traditional topics in abstract algebra while conveying to students that it is a contemporary subject used daily by working mathematicians, computer scientists, physicists, and chemists. The text includes numerous figures, tables, photographs, charts, biographies, computer exercises, and suggested readings giving the subject a current feel which makes the content interesting and relevant for students."

Also, I would like to suggest you read this article in wikipedia. You may find the references valuable.

16

Note: This answer is copied over from an answer I gave on a previous very-similar question, because it still applies here.

This is likely not going to be a popular suggestion, since it's relatively unknown, but I think the perfect book for you is Allan Clark's Elements of Abstract Algebra.

It's a unique book that covers the basics of group theory, ring theory, and even a tiny bit of Galois Theory, but it does it almost entirely through problems. Every chapter begins with a short section defining some terms and giving a few basic proofs, and then it leads the reader through the rest of the exposition in a series of problems, some difficult, some not. The end result is that if you actually do all the problems, you've written the book yourself. It's impossible not to be comfortable with basic abstract algebra if you take this book seriously.

It's also probably the cheapest book on this entire list :)

Adrian Petrescu
  • 1,295
  • 11
  • 27
  • I've never touched this book but based on a review on Amazon by [David B. Massey](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_B._Massey) it seems indeed a good intro book to Galois theory. As long as you don't get the horribly executed Kindle version... – Fizz Apr 11 '15 at 21:54
  • I love that book! – abnry Feb 26 '16 at 16:06
  • 1
    I got the book based on the recommendation here and I love it! The problems are really well sequenced and are giving me a lot of insight. – Adam Brown Apr 07 '22 at 23:53
13

It depends on which subject you’re interested in particular. Here is a list of the books if find go in the greatest depth and yield the clearest intuition on each major subject:


Familiar Structures:


Abstract Structures:

J. W. Tanner
  • 58,836
  • 3
  • 38
  • 78
ABIM
  • 6,510
  • 3
  • 17
  • 38
  • 1
    I hope I can bookmark this answer... – justadzr Jul 10 '20 at 13:51
  • The link to "Serre's LROFG" at `isites.harvard.edu` is broken. I'm also unable to find any snapshot saved on the Wayback Machine. – The Amplitwist Oct 03 '22 at 14:14
  • Also, this answer is duplicated [here](https://math.stackexchange.com/a/1673349) and [here](https://math.stackexchange.com/a/1673344). – The Amplitwist Oct 03 '22 at 14:15
  • 2
    For other users confused like me: Serre's LROFG is likely the Springer book titled [Linear Representations on Finite Groups](https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4684-9458-7) – Calvin Khor Nov 30 '22 at 21:06
11

I learned abstract algebra from Rotman's "First Course in Abstract Algebra". His expository style is easy to follow and the exercises he gives are helpful.

JavaMan
  • 12,951
  • 2
  • 38
  • 61
  • 3
    +1 for Rotman. ANYTHING by Rotman claiming to be a textbook is outstanding in my experience! – Mathemagician1234 Nov 25 '11 at 07:53
  • To single out one: Rotman and Cuoco's book ["Learning Modern Algebra"](https://www.amazon.com/Learning-Algebra-Mathematical-Association-Textbooks/dp/1939512018/ref=sr_1_7?dchild=1&qid=1629390831&refinements=p_27%3AJoseph+Rotman&s=books&sr=1-7&text=Joseph+Rotman) would be an excellent introduction for a beginner. – NickD Aug 19 '21 at 16:40
8

One book that I did not see mentioned, but which really deserves some accolades is the recent book Visual Group Theory by Nathan Carter. There are some excellent accompanying videos by Prof. Macauley on his youtube channel. These go really well together.

The biggest trouble I ran into with group theory and abstract algebra was the dizzying set of definitions that most books present at the beginning. You get a bunch of definitions with little or no motivation and with little description of the underlying geometry of how the binary operations work. The nice thing about the Carter book and the videos is that it spends a lot of time working though group diagrams and showing the "symmetry" of a group. It is easy to get caught up in the formalism, but without a good intuitive understanding of how different groups work--and how simple groups differ--it is easy to get frustrated--especially in self study. Also note that the Carter book has exercise solutions at the end.

krishnab
  • 1,963
  • 15
  • 24
  • This is helpful. I'm working my way through the beginning of Gallian and really wondering what the point is to all of it. – Alper Jan 29 '23 at 17:01
7

I am speaking from the standpoint of a student, and I think that a very good book on introductory abstract algebra that doesn't get mentioned very often is Basic Algebra by Anthony W. Knapp. From experience, the text is accessible with very little pre-requisite knowledge, is less "talkative" than Dummit and Foote (and in my opinion, definitely not dry, unlike D&F), and more rigorous in exposition than Artin's Algebra, although Artin's book is a good and standard first text as well.

Knapp covers most basic topics that the undergraduate student needs to know and is largely self-contained. I think, for the first seven chapters of this book, you can't really do much better by way of alternative texts. However, you could supplement or even replace the eighth chapter with Introduction to Commutative Algebra by Michael Atiyah and Ian MacDonald. However, if you are reading algebra for the first time, I don't suggest using Atiyah's book, unless you are feeling very confident or very lucky! :) Having said that, it is an excellent book and you should try reading it at some point. For the ninth chapter, you could use Emil Artin's classic little book on Galois Theory, based on his lectures on the subject. Another good reference which I haven't used but heard quite a few good things about is Nathanson's Basic Algebra: I (Chapter 4 (?), I think). Yet another book on Galois Theory is D.J.H. Garling's Galois Theory, which is where I initially learnt my Galois Theory from. As for Chapter 10 in Knapp, I have nothing to say, since I never got down to reading it.

Jendrik Stelzner
  • 15,673
  • 4
  • 27
  • 61
7

There is no easy or right answer. I know brilliant professors who cannot easily decide what textbook to use for an advanced math course, and for good reason. Every book has its own strengths and weaknesses. I suggest you go to your math library (assuming one is available during this pandemic) and examine several books. A book you like might be hated by someone else, it is highly individual. You likely will need at least two or three books so you can go back and forth. Even a good book can be bad in a particular section and vice versa. Use a common textbook that has gone through at last two or three editions as a guide as to what topics to cover and then be prepared to use alternate books to actually learn the topic.

Use the Internet. Don't be afraid to read lecture notes or check Wikipedia. Also, Professor Keith Conrad (Univ. of Conn.) has dozens of expository papers on algebra on his web site, some are easy, some are difficult, and some are advanced or specialized. I have found that lectures by professors at lessor known universities to often be better than those by professors at famous brand name universities. That being said, I have found lectures by Unv. of Berkeley professors to be quite good, and lectures by MIT professors to also be good, but the latter are often very fast paced and better for review than to self learn from as they are so intense.

I suggest you get an easy book, an intermediate book and eventually a hard book. Herstein's: Topics in Algebra is harder than Birkhoff and MacLane's book, but Birkhoff and MacLane's book is good for learning the fundamentals. As an undergraduate I used Herstein, but I think it is too difficult to self study from.

It is critical to learn the definitions and other fundamentals cold and then go on to a more advanced treatment. (One really smart professor basically told me: memorize definitions, but do not memorize proofs, just understand them.) Herstein loves to give problems and results that are hard using elementary methods, but easy using more advanced methods. In my opinion this a bad way to learn, as not everybody is clever at solving hard problems or following highly technical arguments, and I think it is more useful to put one's energy into learning the concepts and theory that makes it possible to eventually easily understand what is really going on, rather than rely on clever technical tricks or manipulations to get a result with no real deep understanding as to what is really going on. Neither Herstein nor Birkhoff and MacLane cover everything a graduate course would cover. Herstein, in my opinion, makes the subject seem more difficult than it is.

A free book is by Robert B. Ash (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), titled: Abstract Algebra: The Basic Graduate Year, it is available as a series of PDF's on his web site.

I also use: Algebra: A Graduate Course by I. Martin Isaacs, it has its strengths and weaknesses. It is is elegant and the proofs are carefully done, but it may be too abstract and condensed to self study from.

A classic is the two volume (mostly of the time only the first volume is used) set by B. L. van der Waerden titled: Modern Algebra. There is at least two English editions (the original is in German). Even though the editions differ, any English edition is fine. And if you really groove on abstraction there is Serge Lang's book, simply titled: Algebra.

Alternatively, audit the class you need. Self study is a mixed blessing, as while there are no exams, required homework or time pressure, it can be frustrating and inefficient.

Good luck. I think it is great you are so motivated. Keep the faith. Don't worry if at times you get overwhelmed or discouraged --- self study is not easy --- it has happened to many of us at some point in time, yet somehow we didn't let it stop us, nor should you.

5

My suggestions are 1) Fraleigh 2) Gallian 3) Herstein and 4) Rotman,

Martin Sleziak
  • 51,859
  • 20
  • 181
  • 357
shahul
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 3
    Maybe you could add more information as the poster is asking for a reference request. – Ryan Sullivant Jul 02 '13 at 07:34
  • 3
    I've corrected *Rotoman* to *Rotman* - I suppose it was a typo. (I do not know about a book on algebra by Rotoman, neither does [Google](https://www.google.com/search?q=Rotoman+algebra).) – Martin Sleziak Jul 02 '13 at 08:40
5

Fundamentals of Abstract Algebra by Malik, Sen & Mordeson is a very good book for self study.The topics are covered in detail with many interesting examples and exercises.Also it provides hints and answers to difficult questions making it suitable for self study.

Learnmore
  • 30,186
  • 8
  • 77
  • 224
1

My favorite is Introduction to Abstract to Algebra by Keith Nicholson. There is a course in YouTube, by James Cook base on that book.

David Cely
  • 11
  • 1