28

I would like to show that ring of order $p^2$ is commutative.

Taking $G=(R, +)$ as group, we have two possible isomorphism classes $\mathbb Z /p^2\mathbb Z$ and $\mathbb Z/ p\mathbb Z \times \mathbb Z /p\mathbb Z$.

Since characterstic must divide the size of the group then we have two possibilities $p$ and $p^2$.

Now IU don't understand how can I reason to say that the multiplication is commutative and how can I conclude for the case when characterstic is $p$?

azimut
  • 21,461
  • 10
  • 68
  • 126
Theorem
  • 7,689
  • 8
  • 56
  • 96

4 Answers4

38

Let $R$ be a ring with $p^2$ elements, let $x \in R$, we have to show that $Z(x) = \{r \in R : xr=rx\}$ coincides with $R$. It is an additive subgroup, even a subring, and therefore has order $p$ or $p^2$. In the latter case we are done. Assume that it has order $p$. Every ring of order $p$ is canonically isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}/p$. It follows that $x=z \cdot 1$ for some $z \in \mathbb{Z}$. But then obviously $Z(x)=R$.


For rings without unit, also called rngs, this fails: There are $11$ rngs with $p^2$ elements. Two of them are non-commutative, namely $E=\langle a,b : pa=pb=0, a^2=a, b^2=b, ab=a, ba=b \rangle$ and $F = \langle a,b : pa=pb=0, a^2=a, b^2=b, ab=b, ba=a\rangle.$

Martin Brandenburg
  • 154,019
  • 16
  • 267
  • 487
  • 2
    I hadn't read this while composing my answer (I never think about non unital rings !): +1 . – Georges Elencwajg Feb 16 '13 at 15:20
  • The link may be broken. I was wondering what are the orders of $E,F$? – Not Euler Dec 13 '19 at 12:38
  • 3
    An age later: a student asked me about this proof. It would probably be clearer to organize this is in a different way: «blah blah and therefore $Z(x)$ has order $p$ or $p^2$. Had it order $p$, then blah blah and it'd follow that $x=z\cdot 1$ for some $z\in\mathbb Z$, so obviously $Z(x)=R$: this is absurd, since $R$ has order $p^2$, not $p$. We thus see that $Z(x)$ has order $p^2$ and therefore that $x$ is central.» – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Mar 09 '22 at 04:45
14

Warning: I assume here that "ring" means "unital ring", not "rng" without unity.

There is a canonical ring morphism $f:\mathbb Z\to R$ (this is true for all rings).
Its image $f(\mathbb Z)\subset R$ has cardinality either $p^2$ or $p$.
$\bullet $ In the first case $f(\mathbb Z)=R$ and since $f(\mathbb Z)= \mathbb Z/p^2\mathbb Z$ (the only quotient of $\mathbb Z$ of cardinality $p^2$) we are done: $R= \mathbb Z/p^2\mathbb Z$, a commutative ring.

$\bullet \bullet$ In the second case $f(\mathbb Z)= \mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z$ (the only quotient of $\mathbb Z$ of cardinality $p$) and $R$ is a $\mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z$-algebra.
That algebra is then generated by any element $r\in R\setminus (\mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z)$, i.e. $R=\mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z[r]$, which immediately implies that $R$ is commutative, since $f(\mathbb Z)=\mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z$ is in the center of $R$ and since powers of $r$ commute with each other.

Complement
Actually, we can classify all the rings in $\bullet \bullet$.
If $m(x)=x^2+ax+b\in \mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z[x]$ is the minimal polynomial of $r$ over $\mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z$ we then have $R=\frac{ \mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z[x]}{\langle m(x)\rangle}$ and it follows that $$R=\mathbb F_{p^2} \;\text {(the field with} p^2 \text {elements)},\;\mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z\times \mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z \;\text{or} \;(\mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z)[x]/(x^2)$$ according as $m(x)$ is irreducible, reducible with distinct roots or reducible with a double root.

Georges Elencwajg
  • 146,589
  • 12
  • 279
  • 456
  • 1
    Now $\mathbb{Z}/p^2$ is missing. Sorry ^^ – Martin Brandenburg Feb 16 '13 at 15:25
  • @Martin, yes you are quite right: due to some stupid confusion of mine I had replaced the correct nilpotent algebra $(\mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z)[x]/(x^2)$ by the ring $\mathbb Z/p^2\mathbb Z$ already mentioned in $\bullet$, which isn't even a $\mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z$-algebra! Corrected now (your last comment has been teken care of by explicitly stating that the classification only concerns $\bullet \bullet)$. Thanks a lot for your vigilance. – Georges Elencwajg Feb 16 '13 at 15:44
  • You're welcome. So there are $11$ rngs of order $p^2$, $4$ rings of order $p^2$, and they are all commutative. $p^3$ is far more complicated: *Associative rings of order $P^3$* by Robert Gilmer and Joe Mott. – Martin Brandenburg Feb 16 '13 at 16:04
  • 8
    "**Associative** rings"? Good grief, can't we agree on *any* of the properties of a ring?? – Pete L. Clark Feb 16 '13 at 19:25
  • I completely agree with you, @Pete. And "good grief" reminds me of Charlie Brown, who so amused and moved me in the golden days when I started reading in English, a long time ago. Sigh... (as he also often said) – Georges Elencwajg Feb 16 '13 at 21:22
  • @Pete: I agree, but on the one hand this is offtopic, and on the other hand nonassociative rings are important and useful: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonassociative_ring, http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Non-associative_rings_and_algebras, – Martin Brandenburg Feb 16 '13 at 23:00
10

Recall that a ring which is generates by one element as a ring is commutative. Indeed, it is an epimorphic image of $\mathbb Z[X]$.

Let now $R$ be of order $p^2$. Then $R$ is generated as a ring by one element:

  • If the additive group is cyclic, then any additive generator will generate $R$ as a ring.

  • If the additive group is not cyclic, it is generated by any two $\mathbb F_p$-linearly independent elemements. Since $1\in R$ is not zero, we can pick a $x\in R$ such that $\{1,x\}$ generates the additive group. In particular, $x$ generates $R$ as a ring.

Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
  • 132,241
  • 11
  • 239
  • 367
0

Let $R$ be a ring with unity and $|R|= p^2,$ where $p$ is prime. Let $I$ be a principal ideal of $R$ generated by some $x.$ If $|I|=p^2$ then $I=R$ so if $(R,+) \cong \mathbb{Z}/p \oplus \mathbb{Z}/p$ then we get a contradiction since $\mathbb{Z}/p \oplus \mathbb{Z}/p$ does not contain such an $I.$ So $R\cong \mathbb{Z}/p^2$ so there exists $x\in R$ such that every element of is of the form $k.x$ for some $1\leq k\leq p^2$ and hence the product of any $2$ elements will commute as a result of being finite sums of $x.$

Hence every principal ideal must have order $p.$ Let $x,y\in R$ be arbitrary, $x \neq 1, 0$ and let $I_1, I_2$ be the principal ideal generated by $x$ and $y$ respectively. Then both $(I_1, +)$ and $(I_2, +)$ are cyclic of order $p$ and hence can be written as $I_1 = \{0,a, \ldots (p-1).a\}$ and $I_2=\{0,b, \ldots (p-1).b\}.$ By definition of an ideal, $ab, ba \in I_1\cap I_2 = \{0\}$ it follows that $ab =ba=0.$

Since $I_1+I_2$ is an ideal of size $|I_1|. |I_2|/|I_1\cap I_2| = p^2$ we have $R= I_1+I_2.$ Then for any $c, d \in R$ we have $c = m_1.a +n_1.b$ and $d=m_2.a +n_2.b$ so that $cd = (m_1m_2).a + (n_1n_2).b =dc$ and hence $R$ is commutative.

Aryaman Jal
  • 1,497
  • 11
  • 14