6

牛からミルクが出なくなって

I'm having trouble working out the conjugation of the bold characters. I assume that なって is the -te/connective form of なる... but what the heck is 出なく?

Logic tells me it should be some form of 出る... but I don't know which.

So... can anyone tell me where that 出なく came from? Is it just a typo of 出なくて? Or am I completely misreading this and it's actually a different word altogether?

Hyperglyph
  • 621
  • 4
  • 9

2 Answers2

14

なって is indeed the te form of なる.

出なく is the morphing of 出ない (the negative form of 出る) to allow it to be connected to another verb. so 出ない　＋　なる becomes 出なくなる (to start not coming out) Adding the te form to the end is just a way of connecting it to another sentence.

This can be done to connect any verbs, for example 食べない (negative of 食べる) could become 食べなくなる (to start not eating / stop eating)

So in your example, 牛からミルクが出なくなって would be "The milk stopped coming out (started to not come out) of the cow, and..."

Amy
  • 141
  • 2
  • Thank you for the answer. A follow-up question, if I may... your description of 出なく sounds (to my un-educated ears) like a description of the negative -te form, which I learned as 出な**くて**. Is 出なく a completely different connective form (and if so, does that form have a name)? Or does Japanese have a rule for dropping the ending **-て**? – Hyperglyph Feb 09 '18 at 19:36
  • http://www.guidetojapanese.org/learn/complete/verb_sequences <- Link to Tae Kim's guide on conjugating negative te- form (where I learned it) – Hyperglyph Feb 09 '18 at 19:45
4

At first, I was just going to comment on your comment on the other answer, but maybe a different approach is better.

We can look at this two ways. If we build it up, it goes like this:

  1. 出る - to come out
  2. 出ない - to not come out
  3. 出なく - a "stem" form conjugation of 出ない (Japanese verbs and adjectives share some conjugation rules) such that it can be put in front of another verb. [not really sure how it would translate it English maybe "not coming out" ?]
  4. 出なくなる - to start to not come out. (possibly in the future). Here we are adding the helping verb なる (= to become)
  5. 出なくなって - it is starting to not come out or it has started to not come out [continuative form of naru to express a state of not coming out]

So 出なくなって is the て-form of the helping verb なる when it's helping 出ない [the negative form of 出る]

出なくて means something slightly different. It means "it's not coming out." and is the て-form of 出ない

The difference being that　出なくなって indicates a change has occurred where it was coming out and now is not coming out whereas 出なくて indicates merely that it is not coming out.

So if tried to milk a cow and nothing ever came out, 出なくて but if you milked a cow and it stopped providing milk, then 出なくなって.

In other words, 出なくなって is not a verb sequence. It's a verb plus a helping verb. If you're looking for it in Tae Kim, then it's here.

virmaior
  • 8,126
  • 1
  • 22
  • 50
  • Thanks for that excellent answer. I think I get it now. **Negative** verbs can be conjugated in the same way that i-adjective adverbs can (**い** --> **く**) when they're being linked to なる or する. The meaning is then roughly "to become X" or "to decide to do X", where X is the 1st verb. e.g. **見えなくなった** = "[it] _became_ NOT visible". And if you want to do the same thing with **positive** verbs, you use ことに or ように, e.g. **見えるようになった** = "[it] _became_ visible". In contrast, **見えなくてなった** = "[it] _is_ not visible _and_ became...". Am I correct? – Hyperglyph Feb 10 '18 at 05:28
  • Yep. That sounds right to me. – virmaior Feb 10 '18 at 06:04
  • 1
    You are confusing te-form and 連用形. The 連用形 of なる is なり and not なって. –  Mar 03 '18 at 12:09
  • 勉強になりました。 is it fixed now? – virmaior Mar 03 '18 at 13:14
  • 1
    @Hyperglyph three comments: First, for affirmative verbals, the こと and よう constructions are [different](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/42581/%E3%81%93%E3%81%A8%E3%81%AB%E3%81%99%E3%82%8B-versus-%E3%82%88%E3%81%86%E3%81%AB%E3%81%99%E3%82%8B/42591#42591). Second, direct-style negative verbals and adjectivals are equivalent grammatical forms (i.e. they don't just conjugate the same - they are actually the exact same thing). Third, this adjectival construction has a parallel with nominals as you demonstrated with こと・よう (i.e. that's actually a nominal pattern: nominal + に + なる). – weirdalsuperfan Mar 04 '18 at 09:18