Assuming data are normal: For each person you would use a 2-sample t test
to compare Day 1 and Day 3 (not a paired test, see @SalMangiafico's Comment). In your question, for subject A you show only
three observations on each day. With so little data on any one person (and such large within-day
variability) you will have trouble getting significant results.
For the data in your question, rounded to three places, the P-value is
much larger than 0.05, so you cannot reject $H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_3$ in favor of $H_a: \mu_1 \ne \mu_3$ at the 5% level of significance. A two-sample t test in R follows:
A1 = c(.692, .198, .489); A3 = c(.091, .446, .513)
t.test(A1, A3)
Welch Two Sample t-test
data: A1 and A3
t = 0.56484, df = 3.9676, p-value = 0.6026
alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
95 percent confidence interval:
-0.4311325 0.6504658
sample estimates:
mean of x mean of y
0.4596667 0.3500000
Not assuming normal data: With so little data, there is no point in testing for normality (or for any other
particular population distribution). In case you believe data are not normal, you might use a Wilcoxon rank sum test. But such a test would require at least four measurements per person per day in order to have any chance of giving a
significant result. (Even if all three measurements on one of the days are larger than any of the three measurements on the other day, you still could not possibly get a significant result at the 5% level: $2/{6 \choose 3} = 2/20 = 0.10.)$
B1 = c(.20, .30, .40); B3 = c(.13, .02, .18) # fake data for illustration
wilcox.test(B1, B3)
Wilcoxon rank sum test
data: B1 and B3
W = 9, p-value = 0.1
alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0