-3
Let $"t"$ and $"s"$ be a words we will say that two words are "completly different" if for all $1\leqslant i\leqslant |t|$ the $i$ letter in $t$ diffrent from the $i$ letter in $s$.
Prove that the language $\mathcal{L}=\{ts|t,s\in \{0,1\}^*,|t|=|s|,t,s \text{ completly different} \}$ is not a free-context-language
Attempt :
Applaying the pumping lemma for free-contex-language:
Suppose that $\mathcal L$ is regular so exists a word '$z=uxvyw$' with length of at least $n$ such that:
$(1)\,\,\,|xvy|\leqslant n$
$(2)\,\,\,|xy|\geqslant 1$
$(3)\,\,\,ux^ivy^iw \in \mathcal L\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,i\geqslant 0$
Now, let's choose the word $\color{blue}{z=0^n1^n}$ it is obvious that $|z|\geqslant n$ so we can use $(1)-(3)$
$z=0^{\alpha}0^{\beta}0^{\gamma}0^{\lambda}1^n$
So $\alpha+\beta+\gamma+\lambda=n$
I am stuck here.
EDIT: After using @Renato's answer:
Consider $z=0^p1^p0^p1^p0^p1^p\in \mathcal{L}$ since $|z|>p$, there are $u,v,w,x,y$ such that $z=uvwxy,|vwx|\leqslant p, |vx|>0$ and $uv^iwx^iy\in \mathcal{L}$
$vwx$ must straddle the midpoint of $z$ there are fore possibilities:
$vwx$ is in $0^p$ part.
$vwx$ is in $1^p$ part.
$vwx$ is in $1^p0^p$ part.
$vwx$ is in $0^p1^p$ part.
Thus, it is not of the form that we want
For $i=2$ $z\notin \mathcal{L}$
1
Unfortunately, you don't give us much of an attempt to work with. Plus, your ansatz is flawed already; be more careful reading the theorem! I recommend you check out our reference question and just try out some candidate words. Seeing what works and what does not, you gain experience that helps you picking suitable words faster.
– Raphael – 2016-01-09T09:32:20.333Your attempt is still incomplete. Have you read the reference question? You have to prove for all partitionings of the word as per the PL that something bad happens. – Raphael – 2016-01-09T09:41:24.957
1By the way, community votes please: is this a duplicate of the reference question? As long as the problem is "please explain the Pumping lemma to me", it provides an elaborate answer. – Raphael – 2016-01-09T09:42:02.053
@Raphael yes, I read the referance question, it is almost like to read in wikipedia about the pumping lemma. – 3SAT – 2016-01-09T09:44:10.577
1So? To be blunt, I'm afraid that if you don't understand these resources, you won't understand answers either. – Raphael – 2016-01-10T20:49:06.200